Sunday, February 22, 2009

Missouri School Board Spending Secrets

The Columbia Daily Tribune recently ran a report of the Missouri School Board purposely keeping the public in the dark about important money issues, especially at the association's annual forum.

Independence Superintendent Jim Hinson even praised his school board for not paying close attention to the district’s spending habits. Board members are welcome to talk about long-term goals, he said, but shouldn’t get into details of the day-to-day spending."

Independence has thousands of budget codes that school board members “don’t want to know,” he bragged. And, while board members are welcome to ask about district bills in private, they shouldn’t do it at a public meeting, Hinson advised. Apparently, there are "more important things to do at board meetings" than scrutinize district expenditures.

“The board doesn’t get involved in the daily operation of the school district, absolutely not,” Hinson said. “If they did, I wouldn’t work there.”

Shortly after Hinson spoke, Rick Nobles, a consultant with Patron Insights, urged school leaders to be vague when trying to get voters to approve bond issues or tax increases. For instance, he said, rather than telling district patrons that bond money would be used to add six classes, tell them the money would ease overcrowding. Patrons just don’t want to be beat over the head with details, he said.

Among Nobles' advice: Don't tell voters "it's for the children," he said. "That doesn't pull heartstrings the way you think it will."

This is absolutely unacceptable! The public deserves to know specifically how their taxpayer money is being used! This lack of openness just makes everyone assume they have something to hide. Education dollars need to be accounted for!

Monday, February 16, 2009

Even More Against the Deed Restriction

The community opposition grows against the SLPS deed restrication.
The American Association of Architects (St. Louis Chapter) and the Landmarks Association of St. Louis have joined the fight for our children's education.

Basically, charter schools are currently banned from acquiring any of closing or already empty school properties in the St. Louis School District. Our children or the community were clearly not considered in this ridiculous policy by the Special Administrative Board. Why wouldn't school buildings be allowed to be schools?! No one, including the appointed administration, has an answer.

But for answers to your questions on the issue check out the Children's Education Alliance of Missouri (CEAM) video.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

More Deed Restriction Coverage



The St. Louis Post-Dispatch caught wind of the ridiculous deed restriction clause that stops charter schools from buying closed public school buildings.

Approximately 29 more buildings are supposed to close. There are currently six properties on the market in St. Louis city and 15 others that have been closed and abandoned.

A former school building could be purchased fairly for between $800,000 and $1.5 million, compared to converting a nonschool building, which would cost $2 million to $6 million! This money could be better spent on our children instead.

Community outrage continues to grow. "You losing all these schools," said Lamarr Paige, 38, a father of six. "And all the buildings just sitting there, just sitting there!"

Resolutions has been proposed in Jefferson City and board members have stated that the subject will likely be revisited.

Charter schools ARE public schools, allowing MORE children a BETTER education CLOSE to home.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

CEAM Conference: United for Missouri Kids and Communities

Many leaders from across the state united yesterday for the Children's Education Allence of Missouri's (CEAM) yearly conference to discuss bringing education to our children and hope to our communities.

It is very encouraging to see such a diverse mix--including everyone from Lt. Governor Peter Kinder to groups such as BAEO--coming together to fight--in the both the public and political fields--for education reform.

Supporting charter schools was a main topic. With an increasing number of public school closures all with deed restriction clauses in effect, it is obvious that this school choice NEEDS this support.